The last Document on Fund's Website - Had it transcribed as it was illegible

[Legible Transcription of photocopy]

 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK – NEW YORK COUNTY

(STAMPED) FILED MAY 01 2006

(STAMPED) RECEIVED APR 20 2005

PRESENT: WALTER B. TOLUB Justice

Part ___15

INDEX NO. 1218682007

MOTION DATE 0403/06

Dept? 002

MOTION CASE NUMBER __________      

MORGAN PILLSBURY

                                                Plaintiff

                v.

JOHN FUND

                                                Defendant

The following papers numbered _____ were read to a motion for _____________

Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause – Affidavits – Exhibits --       PAPERS NUMBERED

Answering Affidavits – Exhibits _____________________

Replying Affidavits _______________________________

Cross-Motion ___Yes ___No

FOR THE REASONS

By this motion defendant moves for an order for sanctions against plaintiff Morgan Pillsbury for witness tampering.

The current allegations advanced in the instant motion as that plaintiff has contacted potential witnesses

and has sent unsolicited emails to defendant’s employer. Defendant contends that this behavior

constitutes witness tampering and harassment. Plaintiff maintains the position that she is within her rights

to contact these individuals because – there is not a precisely existing court order preventing or

enjoining the plaintiff from sending out a notice of  suit letter in an aforsaid future case that has not yet

been filed (Affirmation of Gary S. Fish in Opposition to Defendant Motion to Sanction Plaintiff for Alleged Witness Tampering).

This court is appalled by the behavior complained of in this motion and refuses to tolerate any more

Behavior that appears to attempt to further undermine or delaying this case.

As such, plaintiff is hereby prohibited from contacting any and all individuals or entities that may be

Required to appear as witnesses in this case, as well as enjoins associated personally or professionally

with them. Moreover, any communications plaintiff feels are necessary concerning any “foreseeable future cases” shall be made solely through plaintiff’s counsel and should counsel be changed, shall be

 applicable to any new counsel that may step in to handle this case.

Violation of this order in any way whatsoever shall be perceived as contempt of court, and this court

Upon a showing of contempt of this order, will entertain any and all properly made motions.

Counsel for the parties are directed to appear for a Pre-Trial Conference in 1A Part 15, Room 335, New

York, New York, on May 5, 2006 at 11:00 a.m.

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.

Dated:4/11/06 (handwritten) (Initialed)

WALTER B. TOLUB, JSC (Other initials IVOW)

Check one: ___FINAL DISPOSITION   _x_ NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

Check if appropriate: ___DO NOT POST  ___REFERENCE