Saturday, January 5, 2019

Forwarded from Wendy -Feb 27, 2012, 7:45 AM - Laura, Duchess of Manchester, lies, and lies and lies

MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER HAS A ARREST RECORD OUR SOURCES HAVE FOUND MORE INFORMATION ON HER AND STEALING FUNDS FROM PEOPLE SHE WORKS WITH OR FOR.
SHE PUTS THE MONEY IN HER OWN FUND From the A.C. Pillsbury Foundation, MELINDA HAS SEVERAL.

THEN MELINDA MOVES ON STATEING SHES BROKE AGAIN. THEN SHE TELLS THE PERSON SHE WORKED FOR SHE IS GOING TO DO A WEB BLOG ON THEM IF THEY SAY ANYTHING. THE PEOPLE WE HAVE SPOKEN TO AND THAT HAVE CALLED US WERE VERY AFRAID OF MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER. SHE HIDES BEHIND BEING A SINGLE MOTHER WITH A DISABLED SON SO PEOPLE DO FEEL SORRY FOR HER.

MELINDAS ARREST IN ANOTHER STATE AS USUALL...GEORGIA ALSO HAS RECORD OF HER.
Description: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4Sh-f0FI4TS0_jvEP6gzJZIawT8xnUpT8wc6X3fxAJqbgs8-4BNsPdU3k_PJJycwjzR28Bqc-mgP7IVru6r53NcgmFUDJ7n9bzLmEuGvNoOM190vh67TAtZYQWlTKR8uyAbyzwNH32Sk/s640/MILINDAS+ARREST+RECORD.jpg
THIS IS JUST ONE OF MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTERS RADIO SHOWS THAT FAILED. SHE HAS SO MANY WEB BLOGS AND SITES ABOUT HER AND HER VICTIMS, MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTERS FILLS THE WEB WITH HER CYBER INTERNET BULLYING. MELINDA ALSO CALLS THE MEDIA AND DOES FAKE EMAILS AND TELLS THE PRESS. THEN SHE HURRYS AFTER THEY DO THE ARTICLE AND SHE TAKES IT OFF THE INTERNET. WE ALL HAVE HER FAKE EAMILS ALSO.




MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER PUT UP A CONTRACT THAT IS FROM HER TO THE DUKE OF MANCHESTER ALEX NEVER WANTED TO HER TO EDIT ANYTHIG SHE IS NOT A EDITOR? WE HAVE OUR PROPERTY WITH A LAWYER MELINDA CLAIMS SHE DID WORK FOR US WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS WAS. WE HAVE MANY DOCUMENTS, I CAN POST THEM I JUST DONT HAVE TIME TO DEAL WITH HER AND HER LIES. WE HAVE PEOPLE WORKING ON THIS CASE NOW.



THEY HAVE ALL THE PROPER DOCUMENTS WHERE SHE IS DEMANDING MONEY OR SHE WILL DO A SLANDER WEB SITE AND CALL THE MEDIA AND SHE DID. MELINDA AND WENDY CALLED RICHARD KAY AND GAVE HIM A STORY THAT WAS PURE LIES. MELINDA AND WENDY BUFORD HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR MONTHS NOW.ALEX HAS NO ON LINE RANT OR DOES HE KNOW HOW TO DO A ON LINE BLOG?

THE DUKE OF MANCHESTER WOULD NEVER SPEAK OF THE ROYAL FAMILY LIKE THAT. THE DUKE OF MANCHESTER WAS THE QUEENS GUARD AND VERY CLOSE FOR CENTURYS.

THIS IS ANOTHER ARTICLE WENDY AND MELINDA DID, MELINDA TELLS PEOPLE SHE S A JOURNALIST. AND SPINS LIES TO THE PRESS. THEY ALSO INVOLVE THE CHILDREN WHAT SICK WOMEN OR MOTHERS DO THIS.





MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER ALSO DID A FAKE EMAIL MONTYMONT....IN THE DUKE OF MANCHESTERS NAME WE HAVE COPYED EVERYTHING.
WE FOUND OUT MELINDA MADE A FAKE HUFFINGTON POST EMAIL AND CALLED THE PRESS. SHE IS CAUGHT NOT GOOD FOR A WOMAN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?
BELOW ARE SOME OF MELINDAS FAKE NAMES SHE USES...LOOK THEM UP...


KARL SCHWARZ WAS HELPING MELINDA SHE STOLE FROM HIM ALSO. AND HAD HER BILLS PAID AND DID NOTHING BUT STAL AND TRASH HIS HOME.

Karl Schwarz responds to Madame Karnak
August 8, 2005



In a previous email that I sent to Corinne Allan in Ottawa, aka: YaYaCanada, she professed that she and Melinda Pillsbury Foster are not involved with each other in the trash piece YaYaCanada posted about me, do not know each other.

The following trace routes were performed on themelinda@pillsbury-foster.us (email of Melinda Pillsbury Foster), and yyc@yayacanada.com (email of Corinne Allan). As you can see from the ending IP addresses, Melinda Pillsbury Foster and Corinne Allan are using the same IP address, which is clear evidence that they are related and working on this slam piece on me together.

This matter has been turned over to Georgia authorities and my attorneys, who will be filing a massive defamation, slander and libel lawsuit against the parties involved in the trash piece posted by Corinne Allan and then picked up by 911CitizensWatch and Portland.Indy.media. Certain parts of such conduct cross over the line into the cybercrime territory as criminal / felony offenses.

That both of these women are using the same IP address of 64.136.21.190 is all the evidence I need to prove a case against them.

Who is Melinda Pillsbury Foster?

She is the architect of a new political party that I refused to finance, refused to be aligned with, and refused to pay her for while she was supposed to be working on my campaign platform and not working on her pet project of American Revival. In short, I fired her for incompetence and trying to sway my campaign into her way of thinking and her political agenda, which I totally reject.

http://letsrollforums.com/karl-schwarz-responds-madame-t8861.html?s=a965f11219aa94ba222d9077ed809062&s=56cbb26edf960281579c0b42f8f36cdd&p=83415

Here are a couple of other identities that Melinda goes by!m sure there is more today! Someone sent us these!
MADAME KARNAK, & MANY OTHER IDENITIES,
GINA DI MIRANDA, & CORINNE ALLAN
, and there are still many more I wonder if the real Melinda can stand up.
This is just some of the information from the FBI some of the very many complaints in there file on Melinda




WENDY AND MELINDA HAVE BEEN CALLING THE MEDIA FOR MONTHS AND TELLING LIES.


THIS IS WENDY MONTAGU AND THE BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN DO THEY LOOK HAPPY TO BE IN A PRESS ARTICLE THERE MOTHER AND MELINDA PILLSBURY FOSTER SET UP.MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER AND WENDY BUFORD MONTAGU CALL THE PRESS MAKE UP FAKE EMAILS AND FAKE DATEING SITES ON THE DUKE OF MANCHESTER WE HAVE A ENTIRE EMAIL FULL OF THE FAKE WEBSITES. SOME ARE IN ORANGE COUNTY WHERE WENDY LIVES AND WHERE MELINDA IS ALSO STAYING WITH WENDY MELINDA CANT GO BACK TO CEDAR SLOPE IN SANTA BARBARA CA, CPS IS AGAIN WANTING TO
TALK TO HER ABOUT HER AND HER SON. AURTHRS FAMILY IS WORRIED ABOUT HIM.



WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD TELLS CPS AND DCSS THAT SHE HAS HAD NO PAYMENT FROM HER X ALEX MONTAGU, WE HAVE THE EMAIL THE TRUSTEES BACK PAID HER AND I ALSO POSTED HER PAYMENTS COURT ORDER ON THIS SITE. SHE STILL CALLS THEM AND RAGES ABOUT HER X WHO HAS TO BLOCK HER MESSAGES WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD EMAILS HIM EVERYDAY!
Description: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeXx012K8soK30HRlzMomx3zWH9VMi06lqsPaSvyqnGZVZrBX7wNmxcFNUE1HIS4xHKhoz92hTdC3uuVFq3s1COrBVi3VzPeK-m-tmyce9svyQiUpaqOXuMJLQweS-6x4RdTOwvCw4Vgg/s640/alexander+wendy+and+ashley.jpg
WENDY MONTAGU CALLS THE PRESS SHE LIKES HER PICTURE TAKEN AS YOU CAN SEE AND SHE LOVES THE ATTENTION. SHE FEELS LIKE A STAR! A MOTHER SHOULD NEVER INVOLVE HER CHILDREN IN PUBLIC UGLY INTERVIEWS. THIS COURT CASE COULD HAVE BEEN DONE QUIETLY. WENDY MONTAGU WAS 9 MONTHS PREGNANT WHEN SHE MARRIED THE DUKE OF MANCHESTER. SHE HAD NO FATHER. WENDY WAS HANGING OUT EVERY WEKEND AT THE COWBOY BOOGIE BAR IN ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA.
SHE DIDNT HAVE TO DATE ALEX OR TAKE HIS BUSINESS CARD? THE COURT ASKED HER TO DO DNA AND SHE SAID NO. ALEXS MOTHER AND ALEX HAS ASKED HER TO DO DNA SHE REFUSES. HERE IS A LETTER WHERE THE CHILDREN WROTE TO THE COURT THEY DID NOT WANT TO BE WITH THERE MOTHER. THE CHILDREN WANTED TO LIVE WITH US.
Description: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdUm2BLRxqk_ufwmecJbi80VLaMppvxeCUh1a5fS3s0DrKHah5NI6jKZY6VWhEDxiUr4kdhLG17qqyQDRNAeXw_WpvxmjsN6il5jgbRU38ONLJpkpV53vTR7sliSVFXUOKBELqC-bmomQ/s640/ALEXANDER+JRS+LETTER+ABOUT+HIS+MOTHER+AND+WANTING+A+LAWYER.jpg
Description: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt-pRr-_qq3y66HfFpdeaU5AgsFYVIx-HjQ7V5r2AKWiPeXwIaA0K6C7kHQHK3-OtIGf9By01GDoT_e2Ve7IJR6-RLn0ZE0v2Ttd2q440PSB0rLO8rkQP0pkIop5eUAJm2YhrRGPivWP0/s640/ALEXANDER+JR+SECOND+PAGE.jpg

ASHLEY AND ALEXANDER DID NOT WANT TO LIVE WITH THE MOTHER THEY TOLD EVERYONE SHE WAS A DRUNK AND WAS ALWAYS CAUSING FIGHTS IN THE FAMILY. THE NEIGHBORS ALSO SAID THE SAME THING ABOUT WENDY MONTAGU, SHE WAS ALWAYS DRUNK IN THE FRONT YARD, SHE HAS TWO DRUNK DRIVING.WENDY MONTAGU HAS STALKED US FOR SIX YEARS NOW. SHE STILL TEXTS US, MY NEW PHONE I HAVE NOW I HAVE TO BLOCK HER AGAIN....SHE HAS THE CHILDREN CAUGHT UP IN HER STORIES AND GOSSIP.






MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTERS DEAR FRIEND, AND A DISBARRED ATTORNEY CHARLES IS A NICE GUY, BUT SHE WANTED US TO USE HIM AS A ATTORNEY. WE COULD NOT DO IT. MELINDA WENT AND DID HER OWN CONTRACT ANYWAY, THEN SHE SENT IT TO US. WE DID NOT SIGHN IT MELINDA GOT ANGRY. WE DID NOT WANT TO HER IN OUR LIFE FOR ANY REASON. SHE WANTED TO BE IN OUR LIFE AS YOU CAN SEE STALKING.

THEN SHE CALLED THE MEDIA.....THIS EMAIL IS FROM MELINDA ITS IN HER WEBSITE SHE STOLE ON US.

I had persuaded a disbarred attorney, Charles Lincoln, who, none the less, has an earned degree from the University of Chicago. School of Law and a Ph. D. in Anthropology from Harvard, to produce contracts and do research on intellectual property rights sales, promising, after checking with the Duke, he would be paid for work done.

WE WOULD NEVER DO ANY CONTRACTS WITH MELINDA.WE WERE DONE WITH HER AND HER STORIES ABOUT ALL THESE PEOPLE.SHE IS A FRAUD. WHO IS OR WAS HER FRIEND IS NO TODAY.


THIS IS WENDY MONTAGU BUFORD, WE HAVE FOUND OUT SHE HAS BEEN FRIENDS WITH MELINDA PILLSBURRY FOSTER, THEY BOTH HAVE CALLED THE MEDIA AND DONE FAKE EMAILS, WEBSITES AND DATEING SITES ON ALEX MONTAGU. LOOK HOW HAPPY HER SON IS TO BE PUT IN A NEWS AD HOW SAD. WHAT KIND OF A MOTHER WOULD PUT HER CHILDREN IN THE MEDIA AND SAY WHERE THEY WORK AND LIVE VERY SICK. WHY IS WENDY LIGHTING CANDLES IN THE DAYTIME IN HER KITCHEN?
Description: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmP9EmFvIkhRjJItjAbvVQwl-x4S1k-hubVHLi_BERvjflyFcXTaN3cgTri_FkBMkBhEtcMPVzji3VXULAxuDFLG9grp6fT0bjTDVyCpPLAniRN3fpb1rAAeGaO2Wd7-ONBzxNtrVgk8g/s320/crazy+wendy+and+alexander.jpg

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

January 18, 2002 10:21:05 PM PST - From John Fund to Morgan (RE: (no subject)



Subj:
RE: (no subject)
Date:
1/18/02 10:21:05 PM Pacific Standard Time

From:    John.Fund@dowjones.com
To:    mrsdewinter72@aol.com


Anything I can do.Is it enough?John
-----Original Message-----
From: jfund01
To: 'Mrsdewinter72@aol.com '
Sent: 1/19/02 12:14 AM
Subject: RE: (no subject)


December 13, 2001 9:58:23 AM PST - Melinda to John Fund (Subject: I am very concerned)

Subj:
I am very concerned
Date:
12/13/01 9:58:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
From:
To:
BCC:



Dear John,
      First, I want you to know that I got the number and called the Jersey police.  
      Not hearing from Morgan worried me and I am sure you can understand why.  You know she is emotionally unstable and needs calm, not continuous fear an, pain, and manipulation.  We talked about your own concerns that she might harm herself before I know the whole story.   And while it pains me to mention this you must know that battering her is wrong on every level.
      You should not try to keep Morgan from communicating with her family and concerned friends.  That is part of a pattern of control that is always associated with batterers.
      I still think you both should be in therapy.  You should also stop lying and face what you have done.  You are an intelligent man.  You must know, in your heart, what doing the right thing means.
      Please get help, face what you have done, and do the right thing.  

Melinda  

October 31, 2001 2:45 PM - From Melinda to John Fund

-----Original Message-----
From: MPF1free@aol.com [mailto:MPF1free@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Fund, John
Subject: Re: Clarifying unfolding events



Dear John,
      Tell her to get the job she has been promising me she would find for
the past two years.  Any job she gets at this point would be welcome.
MacDonalds would delight me.  
      She was supposedly doing some web work for Steve Craig.  Has that
fallen through?  
      Morgan has a chancy relationship with reality but she is very
intelligent and could do practically anything she chose to work on.  Doris
has offered to l et her go down there and help care for the kids while she
gets her life together.  She should think about doing that and building up
some work history.  
      Thank goodness the other kids are all doing well.  Ayn just bought her
first house and fusses about her portfolio.   I wish Morgan were doing the
same.  
      I just read the postings.  I could see it was her.   
      
Melinda  
<> 


October 31, 2001 11:57:50 AM PST - From John Fund to Melinda

Subj:
RE: Clarifying unfolding events
Date:
10/31/01 11:57:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
From:    John.Fund@wsj.com (Fund, John)
To:    MPF1free@aol.com ('MPF1free@aol.com')


I never heard about any work for Steve Craig. Who is he?

I wish her the best as well, but she doesn't take direction well either by
phone or in person.

I've tried to, honest.

Who is Doris? Doris Gordon in suburban Maryland?

I'm glad Ayn is doing well.

Melinda, I am not trying to prolong ANYTHING.  

October 31, 2001 1:33:24 PM PST - Email from John Fund to Melinda

Subj:
RE: Clarifying unfolding events Volume Four
Date:
10/31/01 1:33:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
From:    John.Fund@wsj.com (Fund, John)
To:    MPF1free@aol.com ('MPF1free@aol.com')



Of course, I credited her with more credibility at the time (September 1999)
.... I never said I didn't believe a word she said. I just never believed
all or most of it.

Morgan is telling people she is living in my apartment still?

Some matters are best discussed over the phone....I am not trying to be
evasive.
<> 


----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <John.Fund@wsj.com>
Received: from  rly-xd05.mx.aol.com (rly-xd05.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.170]) by air-xd02.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILINXD29-1031163324; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:33:24 -0400
Received: from  gateway.dowjones.com (gateway.dowjones.com [208.144.114.11]) by rly-xd05.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXD53-1031163307; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:33:07 -0500
Received: by gateway.dowjones.com; id QAA08519; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:33:05 -0500
Received: from sbkmxsmb01.mcn.dowjones.com(162.55.46.103) by gateway.gateway.dowjones.com via smap (V4.2)
    id xma008383; Wed, 31 Oct 01 16:32:32 -0500
Received: by sbkmxsmb01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    id <VWZ80X40>; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:32:31 -0500
Message-ID: <E0CF7AAE8DB4D5118AEB0002A5644A504A931B@WFCMXSMB04>
From: "Fund, John" <John.Fund@wsj.com>
To: "'MPF1free@aol.com'" <MPF1free@aol.com>
Subject: RE: Clarifying unfolding events  Volume Four 
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:32:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"

January 19, 2002 12:10 AM - Email from John Fund to Morgan at her Mrsdewinter email address




-----Original Message-----
From: Mrsdewinter72@aol.com
To: Fund, John
Sent: 1/19/02 12:10 AM
Subject: (no subject)

Thanks for the checks honey!Love you!Morgan
Is it enough?I hate dragging you in to this.John
<> 


----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <John.Fund@dowjones.com>
Received: from  rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3]) by air-yb01.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINYB18-0119012105; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:21:05 -0500
Received: from  sb2insgproxy2.sb2insgproxy2.dowjones.com (sb2insgproxy2.dowjones.com [208.144.114.14]) by rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYB31-0119012059; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:20:59 -0500
Received: by sb2insgproxy2.sb2insgproxy2.dowjones.com; id BAA18109; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:20:59 -0500
From: <John.Fund@dowjones.com>
Received: from sbkwebmxs1.dowjones.com(208.144.113.80) by sb2insgproxy2.dowjones.com via smap (V4.2)
    id xma017894; Sat, 19 Jan 02 01:20:13 -0500
Received: by sbkwebmxs1.dowjones.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
    id <C4HCJYPC>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:20:08 -0500
Message-ID: <B399D4A54545D5118BAA0002A5092E0901ADE2B4@sbkwebmxs1.dowjones.com>
To: mrsdewinter72@aol.com
Subject: RE: (no subject)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:20:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"

Monday, December 31, 2018

An Open Letter to Steven M. Craig -


Steven M Craig was not a journalist.  He wrote restaurant reviews and faxed them to the willing from his home fax machine.  It is likely, however, Steven was a recepient of aid from the Alterman - Fund Fund for Employment-Challenged Journalists. 

An Open Letter To Steven M. Craig


Dear Mr. Craig,

            I received a copy of your faxed newsletter from a third party.  Even though I am continuously mentioned, and I might add, libeled, you did not see fit to contact me in advance of publication.  A curious omission. 
            You have violated the usual standards and practices for journalistic endeavors in so many particulars that I am somewhat at a loss to know where to start.  But I will try to be as brief as possible given the obvious constraints. 
            First, I know you only from four or less phone conversations all of which took place last summer or autumn.  I talked to you because you expressed concern for Morgan and positioned yourself as a friend of hers who wanted to protect her from behavior on John’s part that was inappropriate.  You were never contacted as a journalist. I always believed you were Morgan’s friend, not a journalist looking for a quick sale. 
In the last conversation we had you expressed concern that John was trying to create the appearance of fraud on Morgan’s part.   You asserted this many times with great detail as to how it could be accomplished, why John was both capable and likely to do so.
 Morgan was handling the house finances as John had asked and you warned both her and myself of the possibility that she was being set up by John Fund, who is frequently characterized as the individual most responsible for the various ‘dirty tricks’ that so exercised the liberal media during the Clinton Presidency.    You forcefully urged me to make sure that Morgan documented every transaction.  John Fund, you said, is a dangerous man who will stop at nothing.  This chain of events, very clear in my mind, certainly, makes your ‘article’ even more outrageous.  
You touched on one issue that strikes everyone.  Why did John Fund allow Morgan to move in with him, remain, and continue to handle his affairs?  Why did the doyen of devious devisings do what he did?  All chains of causality link to the real nature of the participants. Through their actions people tell us who they are behind the smoke and mirrors, if we possess the insight to really see. 
We will soon see, of that you can be sure. 
Back to the subject. 
            I will itemize your specific untruths and misstatements so that you can recant and publish a retraction in an orderly fashion. This retraction should include a written apology to myself along with a list of  those to whom this idiocy was faxed.
            First page, second column, line 27 – 37.  “When it was learned that he not only had an affair with Morgan’s Mother while he babysat for young Morgan but later impregnated her when she came to New York as an adult, it caused a shudder in the right wing community.”
            John never babysat any of my children.  He lived in Sacramento; I lived in the Los Angeles area. He was in their presence once or twice. I keep hearing this story and still wonder where it came from.  As to the reaction of the ‘right wing community,’ I would not know.  I know lots of right-wingers, but most of them are entirely oblivious to this drama.  As I have frequently told John, he is not as important as he thinks he is. Most people neither know nor care who he is.  But everyone who knows about it who is a friend of mine is just appalled.    Are you intimating with your comment that somehow left-wingers believe it is open season on the children of their friends?  What a curious world you inhabit. 
First page; 3rd column ;line 8 – 18.  “There was even the possibility expressed by Morgan herself that Fund was her Brother’s sire.” 
First, you should not capitalize brother.  You are not u sing it as a proper name. A simple glance at my youngest son leaves the viewer with no doubt as to his parentage.  I was very sure of the matter and, in fact, knew that no other genetic combination could have been possible except that which is acknowledged. This may surprise you, so brace yourself.  Women generally know these things.  Certainly I did.  Biology, unlike politics, has laws based on physical reality.  If Morgan told you that was a possibility then she was mistaken. Morgan’s relationship with the truth used to be problematical.  She is much improved in the last year, having had to deal with the continuous lies of Mr. Fund.  Now she understands how totally aggravating it is to slog through unending mires of mendacity.   
First page: 4th column; line 39 – 41 to Second page; 1st column; Lines 1 – 9   “Her Mother, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, during this time was in the campaign and had sent off e-mails to executives of the Journal and even to Laura Bush, or so she claimed to me, disparaging Mr. Fund’s character.  She oddly, however felt he should do the “right thing” and marry her daughter when he was her ex-lover, Family Values Libertarian Style. (She is a prominent and well known spokesperson for the cause.)”
Campaign?  I write a letter asking people to let them alone to deal with their problems and I am interfering. But if I had done nothing I would have been neglectful.  Rock and a hard place, don’t you think?
Morgan is my daughter.  Parents don’t abandon their children even when those children do stupid things.  I did not want them to marry.  But I could not get Morgan to leave.  I was hoping you were wrong about John and that these two troubled people could work things out.  We all entertain hopes on the way to reality.   Parts of the story were invisible to me, living as I do 3,000miles away.
When is a mother deemed to be absolved of the bindings of motherhood?   Short answer:  Never.  Morgan is a woman grown and of mature years.  I cannot order her.  I can only attempt to persuade and to point out the inappropriateness of behavior revealed to me either by her or by others.   I never stop hoping.  Not an easy job, rest assured. 
I have never sent a letter to Laura Bush regarding this matter nor did I tell you I intended to do so.   I am sure the First Lady keeps accurate records so you could ask her office.  I cannot imagine what writing to her would have accomplished.  This is not a problem with literacy, presumably. However, I did go to tea at the White House last spring before this all happened.  But the event, while not public, was on behalf of Federated Republican Women.  I am a member of Federated Women.  In fact, I am First Vice-President for Santa Barbara County this year.  I am also a regent for Federated and attend lots of their events.  This leads me to the next point. 
I am not a spokesperson for the LP.  I am sure they would reel with horror at the suggestion.  I reregistered Republican in 1988, joining Federated soon afterwards.   Surely 14 years is a long time, even to someone as inexact as you seem to be.  I have donated to Libertarian candidates from time to time; helped out here and there when asked by a friend.  I have occupied no office. 
If you know many Libertarians you know that they harbor opinions on issues pertaining to “Family Values’ on pretty much the same range of outrageous and sublimely horrible as do individuals in other parties.  Individuals within that party have also been known to act in ways that contradict their expressed opinions.  That is one of the problems with all collectivism. It uses specifics to ignore ranges of behavior.  As individuals, most Libertarians are as responsible as Reps. and Dems; or Greens, for that matter.  You get stinkers in every bunch. 
I did write a private letter to Paul Gigot asking him to intervene at one point. That was after Morgan was being battered.   John’s behavior underwent a salutary change for the better immediately thereafter.  Unfortunately, it did not stick. 
Page 2; 1st column; lines 9 – 21    “It there fore came as no surprise when Page Six of The New York Post ran an item in January that they were engaged and that invitations were sent out.  The very next day there was a retraction with a comment by Morgan that her mother should in effect mind her own business.”
I would be very interested to see any material that backs up any part of this assertion.  First, I grudgingly agreed to host a small private wedding after a conversation with John and an e-mail that indicted to me his wish that they marry.    I begin the very moderate and private arrangements for that wedding immediately since the date loomed.  Even small weddings take time. I e-mailed updates and questions to John and Morgan regularly.  I was especially worried about John’s family’s ability to eat the fish I planned for the reception, as I remember.  John’s one comment was on the program I planned to give attendees.  The twenty invitations to what I insisted must be a small and very private wedding are still sitting in a pile in my office. None were ever mailed.  I e-mailed two people with the artwork for that invitation before retracting it.  Those two people were, surprise, Morgan and John.  One of them sent it onto various people, evidently.  I did not.  I sent an e-mailed copy to Lloyd Grove afterwards at his request.  I didn’t consider the matter confidential. Just not interesting to non-family members. 
            Page 2;column 3; lines 26 – 34.  “Her mother, coincidently happened to come to New York while all these recent activities were taking place and presumably is lending moral support to her abused daughter. 
            I made plans to come to NY when asked to attend the American Theatre Critics Conference by my friend Michael Grossberg. Michael and I have been friends for 25 years.  He is a theatre critic for the Columbus Dispatch and active in the organization.  He will confirm what I have said.  I do not doubt that Morgan has been abused.  She was shaky and distraught when I arrived.  John Fund had decamped just minutes before I walked in. He is over six feet tall.  Morgan is 5’1” in height.  John denied being there.  The security at the door later affirmed that he had been. I have and will testify that I believe Morgan was abused, then and earlier.  I do not lightly commit myself on such matters. 
            Morgan has been known to lie.  That is why she taped John in the first place.  I still ask her for documentation when ever possible. She gives it to me.  John never would. 
            You can send your retraction to me care of Morgan’s attorney, William Cobb.


Free Republic's Deluded Fund Supporters - 2002


The gentleman who wrote the short article below is a good man, committed to honor, justice and his country.

Banned from Free Republic… for Goring a Sacred Cow???

Morgan warned me this would happen.

My screen name was MaligneInterceptor.  I was a happy Freeper until this August.  Loved FR.  Posted semi-regularly with a group of cyberfriends on the Freeoples Thread.  Celebrated conservative/libertarian ideas.  Observed the posting rules religiously.  Promoted FR among friends and relatives, encouraging them to join the fun.  EVEN DONATED MONEY.  Yet after compiling a two year record of no infractions, I was banned without explanation.

I hadn’t posted much in the past year – a second child really soaks up the time.

Recently Morgan pointed me to a thread entitled “Who Framed John Fund?”  I’d read a few of the earlier John Fund/Morgan Pillsbury threads; this one wasn’t much different from the others.  The usual Fundies were out, hurling invective at Morgan and her mother.  Some genuinely good people also made an appearance, offering their support for what they believed to be a good man.  Entirely missing was any post in support of Morgan.  Having been banned from FR close to eighteen months ago, she was unable to respond for herself.  The one-sidedness of the thread appalled me; I decided to respond. 

I initially Freepmailed those whom I was reasonably certain weren’t Fund’s friends/acquaintances/paramours.  I avoided those thought to be his associates; I reasoned there was no point attempting to engage them, since they appeared close-minded on the issue.  Upon reflection, I decided to post publicly – their trashing of Morgan had been public, so it seemed fair that their defense of their position should be also.

I put up a lengthy post, detailing the facts as I knew them.  The response of the Fundies was typical; no attempts were made to challenge my post; their response was more invective.  The other Freepers responded as Freepers do when they believe a troll has soiled a thread:  they gave no ground, persisting in their support of Fund.

I responded to their individual posts one-by-one about a week later, giving further details in hopes of persuading them that their support of Fund was misplaced.  Less than an hour after I posted my final reply, the entire thread was pulled, and my posting privileges were revoked.  It was after 2am EST on the day this happened.

Did I break any rules in my posts?  None that I’m aware of.  Was I banned for presenting the other side of an argument about a Free Republic favorite son?  Perhaps.

You be the judge. 

The “offending” thread disappeared before I was able to save it, but I did capture the “My Comments” section of my Free Republic account.  Linked here is that document – if you scroll down to the first lengthy post (about halfway down, dated “08/07/2003 5:00 AM PDT #42 of 86”), you’ll see my first comment on this thread.  Scrolling up, you’ll be able to read the responses in order, as well as my replies to them.

I’ll miss Free Republic.  Lots of good stuff happens there.  There was nothing good about this.

Respectfully,
MaligneInterceptor

Thursday, December 27, 2018

Letter to WebCommanders demanding refund. The owner of Webcommanders was Jack Dean




August 29, 2002



Dear WebCommanders:


You might not have noticed that I sent you a letter regarding this account that clearly indicated that your non-sites, not maintained for the last three years are of less than no value.  Presence on the web?  What a joke. 
I want my money back.  I have at this point three very functional sites with wonderful content and great service from a reliable provider who is better than his word.  Sites were up and functional in less than a week. 

Those are:  acpillsburyfoundation.com
                   Melindapillsbury-foster.com
                   Womensinstitutes.com 

            Just send back the money, including the retainer of $2,000 I originally sent.  It has been real.

Sincerely,




Melinda Pillsbury-Foster