Friday, December 28, 2012

Exhibit 53 –Letter to Scott Franklin, Dated July 5, 1998

 
Exhibit 53 -
Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 51, true and exact copies of the original in my possession of “Exhibit 53Letter to Scott Franklin, Dated July 5, 1998,” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession, these facts are referenced herein as though set forth in full. 
 

July 5, 1998


Dear Scott,
First, thank you for doing the right thing and returning the money. Now I am going to discuss the content of your letter.
You attacked Morgan. This is a simple fact. You, no one else, threatened her life and the lives of the other children. I am not sorry that I refused to allow you to live with us any longer. It was incumbent on me, as a responsible adult, to protect all of the children under my care, including you.
I am sorry that the breech between us occured. But I do not see how I could have prevented that. In retrospect you were not the source of the problem. Craig was. From the beginning he refused to back me up as your step-parent. This led to a steadily deteriorating situation in which I was unable to maintain discipline and guarantee the safety of those who lived there.
Craig was a terrible example of how to live without violence, as you well know. He was a terrible example of how to live together in any way. You, as any teenager would have, took advantage of the situation and appealed to Craig whenever you didn’t like my decisions. But he was not the one raising the family. I was. He was hardly there. When he was home he secreted himself in his bedroom, a pattern you were long familiar with.
Think about your relationship with Craig then and earlier. You wanted him to love you. He had told you for years that your mother was keeping the two of you from being together. But it wasn’t true, was it? Do you think that Craig loves you better now?
You went from a situation with us where you were not getting enough discipline or individual attention to a situation where you were. You began living with your Aunt Priscilla. It was a good change for you. It enabled you to graduate high school and begin college. I know that it hurt feeling rejected. Of course it did. And if I had been able to trust Craig’s judgment it would not have been necessary. But I had learned that trusting Craig’s judgment was impossible.
You were not put up in a motel to ensure your safety. This was made necessary by your violent behavior. You do recall that you and Craig were the only ones who were ever violent, don’t you? Our fear was for the safety of others, not your safety. That violent behavior did not start with your attack on Morgan. You will remember you also had been violent towards your own mother, hence, your change of residence to Burnet. You brought your problems with you.
Remember the events of that spring. You hurt Dawn by throwing her cat at her in the pool. That was an act that could have caused her more serious injuries than the rather bad scratches she sustained. The cat could have scratched her eyes. Throwing the cat was an act of animal abuse. I am sure, when you recall what you did, you are ashamed.
Do you remember why you were living in the garage? Edi offered to share his room with you and you bullied and physically abused him. Craig would have let you get away with it, even given you Edi’s room. Do you think I regret putting my foot down and refusing to allow that to happen? I don’t.
Frankly, I do not know what I could have done differently that would have been responsible. I am sorry that your feelings were hurt. But imagine the consequences if I had allowed you to remain and you had harmed one of the children badly enough to require hospitalization, or even killed one of them? I had to accept that as a possibility. That would have had life-wrenching consequences for you as well as the rest of us.
Imagine what would have happened if you had succeeded in strangling Morgan. You would have been incarcerated, perhaps treated, but certainly involved in the justice system for all of the remaining years of your childhood and a good part of your adulthood. It would have tainted your life. And I would never have been able to forgive you. How would you have felt about yourself?
I am glad I did not allow you to stay with us. I am sorry for your pain.
Now I will go over the rest of your letter.
You could not trust me? What a pathetic and self-justifying statement. I kicked you out. I did it openly. I did not mandate a trial; Craig did. The kids all felt, and feel, that your behavior was unacceptable. Since I wasn’t there for the events, I accepted the accounts that were relayed to me. There was no sustantial disagreement as to the facts. I’m not devious. I never have been. You and Craig have been devious, not me.
You said in our previous, last, converation, that if I needed money I could sell the jewelry that Craig gave me. The subject came up over my need for money to pay Ed’s medical bills. I want you to remember that conversation. I want you to remember the previous conversations in which you elicited from me, through careful manipulation and selective slams against myself, which you credited to both Craig and Michael Emerling Cloud, the comments about Craig which you now attempt to characterize as hurtful to you. Did you think I would feel charitable towards either of them when you told me that they wanted to see me become a bag lady?
I wonder how such comments, aimed at yourself, would have made you feel. I wonder what you would have said to a ‘trusted’ confidante in those circumstances.
Did I say uncomplimentary things about Craig? Hell yes, he had just left me, abused my trust, broken every promise he had made to me. He had caused me to have a heart attack, lied about filing his taxes for ten years, abandoned me to clean up his mess and then tried to steal the money he promised me as partial restitution. I was and am angry. But I am justifiably angry. My trust has been violated. You have no such objectively appropriate reason for anger. You offered yourself as a friend and confidant. What did you expect me to say?
Take the log out of your eye, Christian.
If I had known in 1986 that Craig would not file his taxes I would have made very different decisions. I would not have married him. I would not have allowed him to use my money to buy the house on Burnet that he wanted. I would never have lived with him. I would never have trusted him with everything that was most precious to me in life. And you would never have lived with me and my children. And consequently you would be looking at a very different reality.
Don’t think for a moment that Craig would therefore be wealthy. He would, as he well knows, still be a high-tech hobo, disabled emotionally from benefiting from his own brilliance.
As you know, Justin doesn’t want to have anything to do with Craig. That is his own decision, one which I was reluctant to let him make but which, after long consideration and consultation with his therapist, I have agreed to. Justin’s therapist thinks that, no matter how important the father/son relationship is, that Craig is so toxic that Justin is better off without him. I agree.
Craig, through his attorney, went into court and refused to acknowledege that Justin was his son. Justin, as you well know, has refused to have contact with you as well. I am sure that Justin has told you about Craig’s abusive behavior. Justin was publically battered, manipulated and coerced. He has chosen to end his relationship with Craig - and you - because of Craig’s abuse and your behavior towards him and me. Why have you not expressed concern for Justin and what he is going through now - at a younger age than you were when you had to leave Burnet? It is curious that you are more wroth about events in the distant past than you are over Craig’s recent abuse of either Justin or myself. If you are a caring person, how can that be?
To try to justify your behavior, deceiving me, defrauding me, and abusing my trust, by citing things that happened ten years ago is sadly pathetic.
Do you think that you have lived your life with truth, honesty, integrity or anything approaching those values? You have not. I’ll share something with you. I have. I know how difficult that is. I have made mistakes, done things I regret. I acknowledge them and try to make amends. But I will be glad to present my life’s record of what I have done, and why I did it to God when I die. I live my life, every day, in the knowledge that there are only two people whose opinion ultimately matters. Myself and God.
I have done nothing for which I need to be forgiven. You have. When we resumed our relationship several years ago you were an adult. No one coerced you into signing anything. You volunteered that you felt that you had acted inappropriately in 1989. I never would have asked you to make such statements. I was willing to let the past bury itself and begin our relationship anew. And I was very willing to have a relationship with you. We had some wonderful, warm conversations, if you allow yourself to remember them now.
We began anew. I extended you trust, and then, God help me, love. I listened to you, tried to help you with your endeavors. I made sure that we kept our financial committments to you throughout the period of the tax crisis.
Your response to that was a complete violation of trust. That was your choice. I hope that, in the future, you learn that carrying that kind of baggage and acting on such vile motivations is more than just wrong. It was a moral atrocity. I hope that the relationship you can have with Craig, ethical and emotional cripple that he is, will be worth what you have paid for it.
You could always have trusted me, you know. You can still trust me. I never lied to you. I never will. The truth is what we owe even those who make themselves our enemies. I have learned my lesson about trusting you, though, and will not make the same mistake again.
You ended this relationship. I can’t be sure why you wrote that letter, but I suspect that your conscience and Kathy were both in play. If so, I will try to ignore the obvious self-justifications in your letter and hear what you did not say, until you are willing to say it out loud. I think, at some level, you know how wrongly you have acted and are sorry. Maybe, maybe not. But I can hope that you are capable of enough introspection to begin what I know will be a long and painful process. Good luck.

Sincerely,


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Exhibit 52 - Letter to Jacqueline Misho, 1998, regarding mail delivery

Exhibit 52 -  Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 52, true and exact copies of the original in my possession of “Exhibit 51 – Letter to Jacqueline Misho, 1998, regarding mail delivery,” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession, these facts are referenced herein as though set forth in full. 



 
Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
2028 Anacapa Street
Santa Barbara, California 93105
 

Jacqueline Misho
800 Presidio Avenue
Santa Barbara, California 93101



Re: Returned Mail:


Dear Ms. Misho,

Please note that the mail you forwarded to me and which was referred to in your July 7th letter to Terrance Lammers was not bills which I had forwarded to Craig. It was mail which he received because he put in a change of address with the post office, something I had asked him to do months ago.
The two items were, in fact properly mine and he, having caused them to go astray, should have simply forwarded them on to me. You might usefully direct him to do so in the future. I did perform this office for him for many months. I want all items addressed to us jointly to come first to me because Craig is a black hole for all routine matters and will not attend to them.
Furthermore, both of these items had been opened although, since they dealt with the cabin, it was obvious to you and Craig that they were not properly intended for him.


Sincerely,


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Exhibit 51 - Letter to Mr. Clark from Prudential Insurance, May 5, 1999

Exhibit 51 - Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 51, true and exact copies of the original in my possession of “Exhibit 51 – Letter to Mr. Clark from Prudential Insurance, May 5, 1999,” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession, these facts are referenced herein as though set forth in full.


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
2028 Anacapa Street
Santa Barbara, California 93105


 
May 5, 1999




Dear Mr. Clark,

As I told you I am now divorced and intend to keep the house on Anacapa which is insured by Prudential through yourself.
I will forward on to my attorney a copy of this letter, which I am signing and returning to you. But I do not think Craig will sign it. He has refused to cooperate with any routine business and I am now using a mail drop because my mail was disappearing.
I will have my attorney send him a copy with a demand he sign. I may have to take him to court to get his compliance.
He, afterall, changed the address with the mortgage company even though he has not paid the mortgage for over a year. This is the third time he has done this this year.
Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely,


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Monday, December 24, 2012

Exhibit 29d - Letter from Anne Fisher, warning Craig may kill Melinda


Anne Last Name with held, xxxxxxxxxxxxx <anne@xxxx.com>


3/15/10



to me





although i don't agree with all the things you are doing, i do want to let you know that craig is having another outburst and breakdown about being held accountable for his actions with his crimes, illegalities and his tax evasion and fraud as nellie and he are being audited and he is being forced to change nellie to employee status and myself and others... nellie is now conspiring with him to defraud the irs and they are meeting with tax accountant today.  craig is blaming me and you for this and due to his anger and rage from the past in the form of rape and he and his family believing that they can get away with even murder, i want you to know that you and i are not safe from his wrath and abuse.

i am filing for a restraining order against  him and have continued to report him to the authorities.  he did send me  note saying he would take care of the tax problems he has caused, however, because he believes (due to his anger and denial and extreme narcissism), that you and i are the ones who caused his suffering right now.  ivory has left and the rest have left too and his new "the one" sara abbott had food poisoning one too many times and he feels we are out to get him.  now nellie is threatening to leave, because she has been caught with her pants down and is conspiring with him to cover up her abuse of doing what he said to do, even if it hurt others in the process.

by my not having proper tax and income records, i could not report income, i could not justify a loan or unemployment when craig fired me, dumped me or got rid of me...  this caused much harm, and nellie wrote me stating that craig told her not to give me the papers and this is accessory to a crime, since she knew.  she is only going to the accountant with craig today because she lied to the IRS last week telling them that she was independent contractor, however, since she has set hours and duties nd responsibilities and craig directs her, she is indeed an employee.

hopefully, i will be able to now prove that i indeed did work for craig as well and have been denied this, denied the truth, and denied benefits of employment.

i feel with craig's anger and knowing now what i know about his family and the rage that exists within him, that since all his girls are leaving and will be audited and he cannot control them any longer due to the IRS, that you and i may be in danger from the same thing that happened to his son scott and i believe nellie to possibly be helping and aiding him in this.

please take safe precautions.
Anne Fisher,
Identification and email withheld as Anne was a victim

Exhibit 24 - Franklin Wills, 1989 and 1991

24. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 24, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of the “Franklin Wills, 1989 and 1991,” true and exact copies of the originals that are in my possession, written by Sterling Franklin, brother to Craig and an attorney, true and exact copies of the originals in my possession. 
 
 
 
 
1991 Will 
The only change was to remove repayment of a debt owed to Sterling Franklin, Craig's brother.  
The signed original was stolen by Jacque Misho in early 1998 at the behest of Craig.  At that point I was unaware he intended to divorce me.   He returned early from a family vacation in Hawaii to take out divorce papers and plan out his covert assault, intended to make it impossible for me to have representation or support our disabled son.  See Morgan Deposition, 2001, Morgan Affidavit, 2009
 
 
 

Exhibit 19 - Pillsbury-Foster Declaration I, 2009,” a true and exact copy of the original that is in my possession, which was written documenting events pursuant to Cases Nos. 222675 & 233136, Franklin v. Pillsbury-Foster & Pillsbury-Foster v. Craig Franklin, GHS, Inc., Daniel O'Dowd, Jacqueline Misho, and Does 1 – 100, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 233136, 2nd Amended Complaint for (1) Battery, (2) Fraud/Conspiracy to commit Fraud (3) Declaratory Relief

19. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 19, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of the “Pillsbury-Foster Declaration I, 2009,” a true and exact copy of the original that is in my possession, which was written documenting events pursuant to Cases Nos. 222675 & 233136, Franklin v. Pillsbury-Foster & Pillsbury-Foster v. Craig Franklin, GHS, Inc., Daniel O'Dowd, Jacqueline Misho, and Does 1 – 100, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 233136, 2nd Amended Complaint for (1) Battery, (2) Fraud/Conspiracy to commit Fraud (3) Declaratory Relief” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession.
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit 13 - Pillsbury-Foster v GHS, Inc., Daniel O'Dowd, Jacqueline Misho, and Does 1 – 100, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 233136

13. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 13, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of the “Pillsbury-Foster v GHS, Inc., Daniel O'Dowd, Jacqueline Misho, and Does 1 – 100, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 233136, 2nd Amended Complaint for (1) Battery, (2) Fraud/Conspiracy to commit Fraud (3) Declaratory Relief” a true and exact copy of the original that is in my possession, which was filed by Porter against GHS and principals. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit 12 - Porter 1999 Contingency Agreement



12 Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 12, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of the “Porter 1999 Contingency Agreement” a true and exact copy of the original that is in my possession, which I received from Todd Porter on September 10, 1999 by fax before he began work on the law suit against Green Hills Software. 
 
 
 

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Exhibit 27 - Morgan Pillsbury Gell Affidavit II, 2009

27. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 27, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of “Morgan Pillsbury Gell Affidavit II, 2009,” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession, signed by Morgan Pillsbury Gell August 31, 2009, these facts are referenced herein as though set forth in full. 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit 20 - Morgan Pillsbury Gell Affidavit, 2009



20. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 20, a true and exact copy of the original in my possession of the “Morgan Pillsbury Gell Affidavit I, 2009,” a true and exact copy of the original that is in my possession, which was written documenting events pursuant to Cases Nos. 222675 & 233136, Franklin v. Pillsbury-Foster & Pillsbury-Foster v. Craig Franklin, GHS, Inc., Daniel O'Dowd, Jacqueline Misho, and Does 1 – 100, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 233136, 2nd Amended Complaint for (1) Battery, (2) Fraud/Conspiracy to commit Fraud (3) Declaratory Relief,” a true and exact copy of the original in my possession.