3 - Tax Records Exhibit 1 - January 29, 1999 - West Coast Escrow

January 29, 1999

To:  Shanie

            West Coast Escrow

            16501 Ventura blvd. Suite 102

            Encino, CA 91436

            (818) 382-7474

Regarding:  Escrow No. 1-40514-M, Closing date 2/10/97

                        Property Address: 9547 Burnet Avenue, Sepulveda, CA 91343

Dear Shanie,

            You will receive this with a check for $25.00 to cover the costs of obtaining the closing statments for the above escrow.   The fax number of my accountant, Doug Thorburn, is:  (818) 363-3111.

            Thank you for all of your help in expediting this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Enclosed find check for $25.00

Exhibit 36 - Motion by Porter April 2, 2001

(Restored after hacking by the usual parties)

Exhibit 33- Pillsbury-Foster - Franklin Marriages 1987 & 1989

Exhibit 50 - Letter from Buynak January 18, 2005 Note that the Settlement Agreement is null and a criminal attempt at fraud, carried out as a conspiracy

I have the original copy of the "Settlement Agreement" and a copy is now in the hands of a qualified
forensic legal expert.  

Exhibit 38 - Declaration regarding Todd Porter by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

(This was, yet again, replaced after being hacked.)  

If asked to testify under penalty of perjury I would declare the following to be true and accurate.

In 1999 I contracted with Todd Porter, Attorney at Law licensed to practice law in the State of California, to represent me in the matter of fraud perpetrated by Craig Franklin, my former husband, and Dan O'Dowd and others, for the benefit of themselves and Green Hills Software, the corporation where Franklin was then employed as First Vice President and O'Dowd was President.

The fee arrangement was contingency as it had been in our previous dealings. I never suggested that this be modified and would have had no reason to do so since so doing would have materially damaged me. Contingency agreements are signed to ensure that only successful outcomes are compensated. The party taking the risk is the attorney, not the client. Until the morning of March 31, 2001, the question of another form of compensation never arose.

That morning, after we ate breakfast, during which Porter did not raise the question of compensation, Porter opened his brief case and showed me a paper he said was essential to accomplishing the Settlement Agreement. That agreement, he said, was a great deal that he had struggled to get for me. He had discussed 'the deal' with me several times on the phone, never mentioning a change of compensation. He had said during those conversations that he had gotten a real deal for me despite the difficulties he had encountered. I asked once if those were not already mine because of the court order but he said that the court order was not enough to make GHS give them to me. He emphasized that GHS did not have to give them to me. I now know this and other assertions he made to me were untrue.

He immediately went on to tell me that the 'loan' was actually money advanced on the stock that would be exercised shortly when GHS went public. He said several times, emphasizing this, that this was a non-recourse loan and there were no tax repercussions from any part of the Settlement Agreement. He had a guarantee directly from O'Dowd that the IPO would take place before 2004. He represented the paper I was signing as essential to protecting my interests and that GHS, "wanted it done this way." He continued, saying there was a very limited power of attorney with GHS to further protect all parties. He repeated this several times in a conversation that took place five minutes before we went into the offices of Hatch and Parent, linking the paper signed then with the Settlement Agreement. He said the paper he was presenting for my signature was integral to the Settlement Agreement.

The Settlement Agreement was presented to me by Porter as a loan on my options only.

I signed the paper presented but could not read either the document Porter presented to me or the Settlement Agreement, relying solely on Porter to tell me what the documents said. I believed his representations regarding each of the specifics above as accurate on the morning of March 31st. That said, I have now read the document and it does not appear to be the same in length or configuration as that presented to me on the morning of March 31st, 2008. It is entirely different in content if what Porter told me was true. I remember the document as being longer, several pages, that made it impossible for Porter to read it to me in a timely fashion.

I would never have signed the agreement presented by Whitney on behalf of Porter. The alleged, "new compensation agreement," in no particular agrees with what I was told at the time or with the original contingency agreement. In fact, it appears to be written in cooperation with GHS, reflecting a new form of compensation for Porter via the creation of a new kind of stock options, "C," options, which are yet another fiction that is clearly coming from GHS. Porter did not give me a copy of the 'agreement,' instead saying he would send it later. I do not recall having ever received such a document from him.

Retrospectively, I realized that what happened was not usual practice in law, as presented by Porter. Porter dropped all responsibility to act for me to enforce any agreement referring me to direct questions to GHS as my attorney in fact.

I believe that Porter cooperated with GHS to ensure he was paid when he realized he was in over his head and not competent to carry out our agreement.

Response to Jonathan Scott Franklin from Melinda Pillsbury-Foster June 20, 2016

June 20, 2016

Dear Scott, 

It appears that Sterling was successful in having you transferred to a friendlier facility.  This was his goal when I last spoke to him some years ago.   Sterling was always the good boy who helped everyone in his family. 

I remain Arthur's full time caretaker, which I have been since his initial accident.  Craig's successful attempt to persuade him life was not worth living and he should kill himself was another event in a long train of criminal outrages Craig committed.  Your father thought that was entirely appropriate since it would save him money.  Craig has never paid a penny in support for Arthur, communicated with him or shown anything but complete indifference to his existence.  Craig is a psychopath, a fact which must be known to you.

Don't delude yourself into believing he cares about you.  He never showed anything but contempt for you when you were not in his presence.  

As a Christian, I have compassion for victims.  I have no compassion for those who lie and defraud emotionally normal people to gain their ends.  Since you came in through the RMN Insights website I assume you know the facts.  Craig is the one who manipulated me into going to Ohio to be killed off.  I survived.  

He has never stopped going after me.  And I have outed him on multiple occasions.  The truth needs no excuse and makes no apology.  

Now, let's go over the two comments you sent most recently. 

“Do you promise to go all the way? Do you like the exclamation point after my name! The Franklin way... I like to put my kids names out there, since I'm so far far away from them. Maybe another woman who writes to prisoners will pay them a visit? I'm sure she would be a great 2nd mom to them. After all, I am willing to stand and fight what's right, true, ethical and just. Even though, I did sort of screw up and try to murder my wife and mother of my 2 children, who I do love dearly. I just wanted their mother to die. I am so sorry I got caught! If I had gotten away with her murder my two beloved children would have been all mine and my prison pen pals would have been helpful, I'm sure giving them the kind of life, only a 3rd world traveler can have. I should not have mention my imbreeding, I mean... my breeding. This may not have been such a great idea. My father was accused of rape, several times and he beat his ex wife many times and my mother despised him. But we won't talk about him. I'm anxious for your letter. I don't get out to dance, star gaze or ski lately. Just alot of ball and chain gatherings. Do write, I look forward to any and all letters from women." 

"As you see, my uncle and father are no longer helping me with my defense and appeals, so I am seeking anyone who is willing to help me - I was framed I tell you. I did want her dead and I did attempt to hire a hit man online, however, I'm a Franklin and Franklin's can get away with anything and everything. I just don't understand what went wrong here. I'm not the bad guy, she is the one who is the bad guy. Why am I the one locked up. It was entrapment!!! I was set up. I love my chldren. I never would have harmed them. It was her I wanted dead, and her boyfriend too!” 

Are you kidding?  The assertion that, “Franklins can get away with anything and everything,” provides a justification for Craig's devious, perverted, and criminal behavior positions you as either deluded or a psychopath yourself.  Given your present location an assertion you, as a Franklin, can, “get away with anything and everything,” is clearly refutable and actually funny.  Craig's first comment, according to Anne, upon hearing of your arrest was, “That was stupid.  They always suspect the husband first.”   As you know from your participation in the conference calls intended to cause my death you knew he had discussed a hitman.  Perhaps that was the source of your own attempt.  

You appear to believe there is something special about, “being a Franklin.” This is absurdly untrue, unless by special you mean routinely achieving your goals by deceit, betrayal, and violence is acceptable and justified.  

I'm a long way past being shocked by anything lurking in the brain of someone related to Craig.  Sterling and Larry share this delusion of 'being special' for some set of characteristics which are entirely imaginary.  No one in your family, at least Craig's side of it, is in any way special.  They might well, however, share a genetic tendency toward psychopathic characteristics.  Certainly, since both your uncles have asserted their 'specialness due to Franklinism' in my presence the likely explanation is that they are either psychopathic as well or are situational psychopaths acting out flawed ideas repeated to them continuously by their own father, your grandfather.  Neither of your grandparents were anything special, either  They became wealthy by conning elderly people into leaving money to USC by pretending a friendship which was entirely pretense, assumed for the purpose.  I listened as they gloated over their success in this regard and came to feel contempt for both of them.  

You cooperated with stealing the stock options which should have been turned over to me as exercised stock.  You did this for your own enrichment, persuading Kathy, through her parents, to pay the cost, stealing this asset as you left.

  

I can see no evidence you are emotionally normal.  A sad thought.   Kathy's children are safe now.  No one having any contact with Craig is safe, either physically, morally, or financially.  He enjoys destroying people who trust him too much for that to be true, no matter what he says.   

May God have mercy on your soul.

Melinda 

Hightower Vs O'Dowd

All those engaged in the conspiracy lied and were rewarded with extra grants of stock after the buy-out succeeded.  However, this conspiracy never ended because Craig Franklin, one of the original number, continued his attempts to destroy his former wife, Melinda.  The group depended on the fact Melinda was suffering from a heart condition which had killed three of her siblings.  

The conspiracy tried to end the life of Melinda's son, Arthur, but also failed.  Therefore, there in no statute of limitations.

7. Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit 7, Nos a, b., c, d, and e, are true and exact copies of the originals in my possession of the following court documents:

[a.] Glenn Hightowervs. Daniel O'Dowd, Case No. BS 053127, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, September 17, 1998, DECLARATION OF WAYNE B. WEISMAN FILED BY APPLICANT GLENN HIGHTOWER IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION”

[b.] “Glenn Hightowervs. Daniel O'Dowd, Case No. BS 053127, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, HIGHTOWER'S OPPOSITION TO O'DOWD'S MOTION FOR ORDER DISSOLVING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, December 15, 1999, Filing Date September 2, 1998; [c.] Glenn Hightower vs. Daniel O'Dowd, Case No. BS 053127, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO (PROPOSED FIRST MODIFIED INJUNCTION, December 15, 1999; September 17, 1998

[d.] “Glenn Hightowervs. Daniel O'Dowd, Case No. BS 053127, In the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, REMITITUR,” Copy of original order, opinion or decision entered in the above-entitled cause of July 1, 1999 and that this order, opinion or decision has now become final, signed by Joseph A. Lane, Clerk, September 3, 1999. Opinion Hightower is likely to prevail if there is proof of unlawful action by O'Dowd.

[e.]AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION No. 72Y 180 0960 98,” a true and exact copy of the originals that are in my possession, which is a series of documents generated by the law suit filed by Hightower against Dan O'Dowd over O'Dowd's exercise of their sudden death partnership agreement on January, 1998. Decision that unlawful action is not proved.

1991 - Last Will and Testament by Craig Franklin

This is a copy I printed out from a file a Misho missed.  The Will, which is a copy of the signed document, ended up in my graphics files used as a clean back for a project.  I was astonished when I found it - but by then the divorce was long over. 

June 24, 1989 - Second Wedding - Pillsbury-Foster and Franklin

    L - R -       Larry Franklin, Esq., Sterling Franklin, Esq., Craig Franklin, J. Scott Franklin, Arthur Foster, Justin Foster 

                                                                                                                                       CDCR# AD7473 

                                                                                                                                       Housing: A1-138U

                                                                                                                                       Inmate Mailing:

                                                                                                                                       P.O. Box 3030

                                                                                                                                       Susanville, CA 96127-3030 

Scott, Craig's oldest child by his first marriage to  Elaine, is serving a ten year sentence in High Desert Correctional for hiring a hitman to kill his wife.  Scott got the idea from Craig who seriously discussed hiring a hitman to kill Melinda.  Letter from Anne to Melinda 

 

   L - R - Ayn Suzanne Pillsbury,  Dawn Ellen Pillsbury, Morgan Frances Pillsbury

Craig's adoption of all the kids was legal and binding.  He requested Ron cede his rights to him, he named them as his natural heirs, and he presented them as his natural children to everyone we knew.   

And here is the Marriage Certificate signed by Dean Ahmad, who performed the ceremony.

June 19, 1987 - Marriage Certificate - Pillsbury-Foster and Franklin

This was a confidential wedding as we were already living together.  Craig insisted.